Common situation
- AI is used, but ownership and review points are unclear.
- Decisions are scattered across meetings, docs, and chat.
- Policies exist, but do not connect to daily routines.
- Teams move faster, but accountability becomes fuzzy over time.
We help organizations keep judgment, accountability, and security intact as AI becomes part of daily work.
We do not compete on tools, automation, or prompt techniques. We design the operational backbone around what teams already do — meetings, notes, documentation, chat, and decision-making — so outcomes remain explainable over time.
This is a strategic overview in English. Detailed engagement options and package examples are available in Japanese.
When AI enters everyday operations, what breaks first is rarely the model. It is ownership, decision trails, and review discipline. We design the smallest structure that keeps work clear and auditable — without turning teams into bureaucrats.
Most engagements begin after AI is already in use. What is missing is not capability, but clarity: where decisions live, who owns them, and how they are reviewed over time.
Deliverables are written, explainable, and owned by your team. They survive handovers, audits, and scaling — without turning daily work into bureaucracy.
Default stance: design, decision, review. We do not provide staffing-style “work substitution” or ongoing operations outsourcing.
When implementation support is needed, we keep it light: templates, checklists, review points, and handoff-ready documentation.
Typical engagement path
You do not need a full brief. One concrete example is enough.
If budget or bandwidth is limited, we can start with a Spot and leave a clear decision line + plan that your team can execute.