Review AI governance readiness before broader AI use makes the gaps harder to explain.
Use this kit when AI use has started or is being planned, but use cases, information boundaries, output use, human review, records, escalation, responsibility, and next actions are still not clear enough.
What this helps clarify
Use the product to apply a structure to one real situation and leave behind material that can be reviewed, shared, or carried forward.
Use this product to
Identify what is decided, unresolved, and unverified across AI use cases, information boundaries, human review, responsibility, and evidence, then turn the findings into a priority issue map and next-action plan.
Use this product to
Turn unclear AI governance questions into reviewable working material before policy drafting, control design, stakeholder approval, or broader rollout.
Use this product to
When AI use expands before use cases, information boundaries, review, evidence, and responsibility are clear, governance becomes harder to explain later.
Included files
The product includes guides, templates, checklists, and examples designed to be copied into your own workspace.
What you get
Bilingual PDF guidance for choosing a review scope, using the checklist, identifying priority issues, and moving from findings to next actions.
What you get
A styled bilingual spreadsheet workbook covering 57 questions across use context, information boundaries, risk, human-AI decision allocation, review, responsibility, evidence, feedback, communication, and roadmap planning.
What you get
A standalone template for turning checklist findings into priority issues, target states, gaps, decisions needed, outputs, and open questions.
What you get
A standalone template for sequencing immediate, short-term, and mid-term actions, stakeholder checks, deferred items, and management explanation points.
What you get
Markdown and YAML source files for internal reference and adaptation, alongside the customer-ready PDF and spreadsheet files.
Fit and boundary
This section helps confirm whether the product can be used internally, or whether context-specific advisory support may be more appropriate.
Good fit
Best for an AI adoption lead or project owner coordinating input from information systems, security, risk, legal, compliance, and business owners before policy, control, stakeholder, or rollout decisions.
Good fit
Useful when AI use is already happening or being considered, but use scope, information handling, review, responsibility, evidence, escalation, and operating conditions are not yet structured.
Good fit
A fit when the team needs to organize readiness questions before drafting policy, selecting tools, designing controls, or asking stakeholders to approve next steps.
What this is not
The kit supports readiness review and initial structuring. It does not replace a full governance program, formal policy, control design, audit work, or implementation.
What this is not
The kit helps identify governance questions and readiness gaps. It does not provide legal opinions, regulatory conclusions, audit assurance, or certification.
What this is not
The kit does not assess technical architecture, AI-agent completion and independent acceptance, implementation quality, operational assurance, or overall AI maturity, and it is not a tool-selection guide.
How to use this kit
The kit works well as a self-service tool. If interpretation, cross-functional alignment, or evidence checks would help, a facilitated review is another option. Neither path is the correct one — it depends on the situation.
Ask about a facilitated reviewHow to use this kit
Work through the checklist on your own, identify unresolved and unverified items, and turn the findings into a Priority Issue Map and Next Action Plan.
How to use this kit
When answers differ across departments or priorities are hard to decide, a facilitated review with Fragment Practice can help interpret findings and work through one real use case together.
Start using it
Start with one current situation, then use the files to clarify the issue, record what matters, and decide what to do next.
How to start
Pick one real or proposed use case and review the information used, output purpose, human review, responsibility, risk, evidence, and monitoring needs.
How to start
Use the checklist to identify where the organization actually lacks clarity before broad rules are drafted.
How to start
Map the highest-priority issues and decide what needs clarification, ownership, review, escalation, or follow-up first.
Notes
Check format, delivery, and purchase-related notes before using the product.
Format
Purchase notes
Next step
Start with this product when reusable structure is enough. If the review reveals unclear ownership, stakeholder conflict, high-risk use cases, review design, or management-facing decisions, Services or Contact may be the better next layer.
